Fixes the reason why #29101 is hard to replicate.
Related #29297
Create a repo with a file with minimum size 4097 bytes (I use 10000) and
execute the following code:
```go
gitRepo, err := gitrepo.OpenRepository(db.DefaultContext, <repo>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(<sha>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
entry, err := commit.GetTreeEntryByPath(<file>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
b := entry.Blob()
// Create a reader
r, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err)
defer r.Close()
// Create a second reader
r2, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err) // Should be no error but is ErrNotExist
defer r2.Close()
```
The problem is the check in `CatFileBatch`:
79217ea63c/modules/git/repo_base_nogogit.go (L81-L87)
`Buffered() > 0` is used to check if there is a "operation" in progress
at the moment. This is a problem because we can't control the internal
buffer in the `bufio.Reader`. The code above demonstrates a sequence
which initiates an operation for which the code thinks there is no
active processing. The second call to `DataAsync()` therefore reuses the
existing instances instead of creating a new batch reader.
(cherry picked from commit f74c869221624092999097af38b6f7fae4701420)
- Switched to plain JavaScript
- Tested the installation page functionality and it works as before
# Demo using JavaScript without jQuery
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4e536edaead97d61a64508db0e93cf781a889472)
- Use case in `repo-commit` was tested until the point where the POST
request was sent with the same payload.
- Use case in `repo-legacy` was tested completely with comment editing.
- `jquery/no-fade` was disabled as well to stay in sync with
`no-jquery/no-fade`, had no violations.
(cherry picked from commit a5c570c1e02302212a5d8f7cf7d91f24ab0578d5)
- Switched to plain JavaScript
- Tested the wiki creation form functionality and it works as before
# Demo using JavaScript without jQuery
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit ade1110e8b7d94dc142a259854e2b73845eab8b9)
- Switched to plain JavaScript
- Tested the repo migration form functionality and it works as before
# Demo using JavaScript without jQuery
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 100031f5f143a15c79ebbe1b77c86091e3b6d489)
If a documentation file is marked with a `linguist-documentation=false`
attribute, include it in language stats.
However, make sure that we do *not* include documentation languages as
fallback.
Added a new test case to exercise the formerly buggy behaviour.
Problem discovered while reviewing @KN4CK3R's tests from gitea#29267.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Based on @KN4CK3R's work in gitea#29267. This drops the custom
`LinguistBoolAttrib` type, and uses `optional.Option` instead. I added
the `isTrue()` and `isFalse()` (function-local) helpers to make the code
easier to follow, because these names convey their goal better than
`v.ValueorDefault(false)` or `!v.ValueOrDefault(true)`.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Split up `repo.Action` in `routers/web` into smaller functions.
While some of the functionality was very similar (starring / watching),
they are ultimately separate actions. Rather than collecting all of them
under a single handler (`repo.Action`), split them up into smaller,
independent functions.
This does result in a little bit of code duplication, but the
independent functions should be easier to follow and understand.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
The "desc" action has not been used since at least 2016, probably much
earlier. It's an ancient Gogs artifact - drop it.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- Trivial auto-fix applied.
- Removed CSS that was no longer needed (either was removed or upstream
already improved the CSS).
- Used existing variables for colors.
- Fix CSS selectors to match existing ones.
- If a `logout` event is send the user should be redirected to the
homepage, there are three mechanism that can do this. The response of
`/user/logout` and the event listener of notifications or stopwatch.
It's essentially a race for what's processed first to determine which
mechanism takes care of redirecting the user.
- Fix that the redirection mechanism of the notification and stopwatch
event listener redirects to an absolute URL.
- Ref: #2135
- If a user tries to create another protected branching rule that
specifies a set of branches already used by another rule, do not allow
it.
- Update the translation accordingly.
- Adds integration test.
- Resolves#2455
