no issue
- currently if you would like to edit a resource (e.g. post) and you pass an invalid model id, the following happens
- permission check calls `Post.permissible`
- the Post could not find the post, but ignored it and returned `userPermissions:true`
- then the model layer is queried again and figured out that the post does not exist
- A: there is no need to query the model twice
- B: we needed proper error handling for post and role model
no issue
- this commit cleans up the usages of `include` and `withRelated`.
### API layer (`include`)
- as request parameter e.g. `?include=roles,tags`
- as theme API parameter e.g. `{{get .... include="author"}}`
- as internal API access e.g. `api.posts.browse({include: 'author,tags'})`
- the `include` notation is more readable than `withRelated`
- and it allows us to use a different easier format (comma separated list)
- the API utility transforms these more readable properties into model style (or into Ghost style)
### Model access (`withRelated`)
- e.g. `models.Post.findPage({withRelated: ['tags']})`
- driven by bookshelf
---
Commits explained.
* Reorder the usage of `convertOptions`
- 1. validation
- 2. options convertion
- 3. permissions
- the reason is simple, the permission layer access the model layer
- we have to prepare the options before talking to the model layer
- added `convertOptions` where it was missed (not required, but for consistency reasons)
* Use `withRelated` when accessing the model layer and use `include` when accessing the API layer
* Change `convertOptions` API utiliy
- API Usage
- ghost.api(..., {include: 'tags,authors'})
- `include` should only be used when calling the API (either via request or via manual usage)
- `include` is only for readability and easier format
- Ghost (Model Layer Usage)
- models.Post.findOne(..., {withRelated: ['tags', 'authors']})
- should only use `withRelated`
- model layer cannot read 'tags,authors`
- model layer has no idea what `include` means, speaks a different language
- `withRelated` is bookshelf
- internal usage
* include-count plugin: use `withRelated` instead of `include`
- imagine you outsource this plugin to git and publish it to npm
- `include` is an unknown option in bookshelf
* Updated `permittedOptions` in base model
- `include` is no longer a known option
* Remove all occurances of `include` in the model layer
* Extend `filterOptions` base function
- this function should be called as first action
- we clone the unfiltered options
- check if you are using `include` (this is a protection which could help us in the beginning)
- check for permitted and (later on default `withRelated`) options
- the usage is coming in next commit
* Ensure we call `filterOptions` as first action
- use `ghostBookshelf.Model.filterOptions` as first action
- consistent naming pattern for incoming options: `unfilteredOptions`
- re-added allowed options for `toJSON`
- one unsolved architecture problem:
- if you override a function e.g. `edit`
- then you should call `filterOptions` as first action
- the base implementation of e.g. `edit` will call it again
- future improvement
* Removed `findOne` from Invite model
- no longer needed, the base implementation is the same
closes#9314
* added fixtures for contributor role
* update post api tests to prevent contributor publishing post
* update permissible function in role/user model
* fix additional author code in invites
* update contributor role migration for knex-migrator v3
* fix paths in contrib migration
* ensure contributors can't edit or delete published posts, fix routing tests [ci skip]
* update db fixtures hash
* strip tags from post if contributor
* cleanup post permissible function
* excludedAttrs to ignore tag updates for now (might be removed later)
* ensure contributors can't edit another's post
* migration script for 1.21
refs #9178
- `checkFileExists` and `checkFileIsValid` where dirty required from web/middleware
- these two functions are only used in the target middleware
- let's move them
refs #8602
- Add the wiring to pass attributes around the permission system
- Allows us to get access to the important "unsafe" attributes that are changing
- E.g. status for posts
- This can then be used to determine whether a user has permission to perform an attribute-based action
- E.g. publish a post (change status)
refs #9043
- Move api util tests into api section
- Adding export test to utils to see the amount of functions which are exported
- Adding basic handlePermissions tests
2017-09-26 10:23:02 +02:00
Renamed from core/test/unit/api_utils_spec.js (Browse further)
