refs: #13380
- The i18n package is deprecated. It is being replaced with the tpl package.
Co-authored-by: Aleksander Chromik <aleksander.chromik@footballco.com>
refs: #13380
- The i18n package is deprecated. It is being replaced with the tpl package.
- The changed files are under `core/server/api/v2` and `core/server/api/v3`.
refs: #13380
The i18n package is deprecated. It is being replaced with the tpl package.
The files changed are under `core/server/api/v2` and `core/server/api/v3`.
refs: #13380
The i18n dependency is deprecated, it's being replaced by the tpl one.
The `tags.js` files changed is under the following folders:
- core/server/api/canary/
- core/server/api/v2/
- core/server/api/v3/
refs: #13380
- The i18n package is deprecated. It is being replaced with the tpl package.
The files changed is under `core/server/api/v2` and `core/server/api/v3`.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
refs https://linear.app/tryghost/issue/CORE-13
- The controller code is not meant to contain complex business logic. Removed complexity in settings.edit method
- Have brought up to sync v3 controller code to the changes that were done in v4. Didn't touch v2 controller as it had slight API differences, so avoided going on another trip into the unknown
- Migrating v3 controller was pretty straigh forward as it's an exact copy of the v4 one (at least for the methods that were extracted)
refs 70627d84a7
refs 44035fd591
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/477
- When v4 Webhook API was changed removing redundant code v3 API code should've been updated as well. Making this change before extracting logic out into a WebhooksService to have clear chain of why the code that doesn't look the same has been substituted
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
refs https://linear.app/tryghost/issue/CORE-10/tackle-integrationsjs
- The controller code is not meant to contain complex business logic.
- Added a test case checking 'PUT' endpoint for integrations to ensure
proper 'NotFound' handling. Found that previous implemenation was
buggy - threw a 500 as 'models.Integration.NotFoundError' that was removed
in previous commit didn't catch a needed error.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/issues/12942
The function signature of this method has changed, and was only updated
in the canary API, this meant that API requests attempting to link a
stripe customer to a member would error for the v3 API.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- The canary schedules controller was refactored to use newly introduced post-scheduling service in a previous commit. This is a follow up to match v2/v3 controllers as they had identical code to the canary one.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- Additional try/catch block needed in async/await implementation increased method complexity and broke the complexity linting rule. This is a dirty way to fix the warning. Ideally the implementation should stay with async/await syntax and instead move the custom error handling logic into some different layer. For example we could introduce a separate "stage" in the API framework's "pipeline" where we'd catch and handle in a generic way all of the "unique" types of errors. It would make sense to have a generic handler because this same code happens in labels, member and few more places.
refs baccbb4942
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- The change is here to remove yet another ESLint method complexity error
- The custom error handling complexity was introduced here in a referenced commit without an obvious reason. The specifics of how the "sendTestEmail" method handles errors should not leak out from the method, if there are errors in the response they should be handled internally and the method would uniformly reject with a single error.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- The code complexity in the email preview's read controller method was breaking the complexity rule in ESLint. To reduce the complexity extracted common parts into mega service
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- async/await has been a standard way to handle async code throughout the codebase. Refactoring it before moving code makes it way easier to reason about similarities between multiple controllers
no issue
- Logic with slightly more complex structure belongs to the service. Extracting it there also show's how little of an API the oembed service should actually expose
- Unquestionably, at some point we need to rework the API code so that we have less stuff everywhere
- However, the max-lines index.js rule exists as a proxy to find index.js files which are not exposing Public API, but rather contain logic
- These 6 cases are all valid index.js files as the expose the Public API of the module
- Therefore, I've added an override and an override notice explaining.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/949
- Initializing PostsService with almost identical parameters is burdensome, having a single factory method in create instances is far more maintainable
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/949
- The post model handling related to newsletter sending and email recipient filter logic were duplicating across v3/v4(canary) APIs and it made sense to extract it into a posts service.
- This will allow for a central place to handle about to land logic for email_only newsletter handling.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/949
- The code is exactly the same in six (!) places. It's beyond unmaintainable to add another line to any of these place, which will be needed for `email_only` handling.
- The newly created posts service is a temporary, slightly better solution that complies with codebase's best practice of extracting new services using class with DI pattern
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/949
refs e64274bb45
- This refactor is needed to bring the code in line with the rest of pages API controllers
- Next step will extract shared code patterns into a separate module
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/912
- Exposing a single method out of the service makes the API surface smaller - more readable.
- Additionlally having a wrapping method in service will be helpful for other triggers that are going to be executed in later iterations
no issue
- i18n is deprecated in favour of `tpl`
- normalized method syntax so `add` matches the rest of the controller's methods (fixed a complexity warning but was not the primary intention)
- This is a precursor to trying to split apart into:
- model events + webhooks system which makes sense
- frontend events which should be independent or removed
- maybe some concept of a settings manager that we can use in various places to bind logic 🤔
- other usages of events that should be refactored to not use events
refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/831
- This ultimately fixes the index.js file
- It also makes it super clear what methods in the themeService are used by the API, and which are part of the service loading logic
- It also moves the activate and init function into a single file in a way that highlights they are very similar
- They are also very similar to what happens in storage.setFromZip but that code is mixed up with storage code at the moment
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/849
As part of work for segmented post access with multiple products, the custom filter for post access is stored in `visibility` field on posts but passed with `visibility_filter` property on API. This change -
- updates input serializer of posts to transform `visibility` and `visibility_filter` properties correctly
- updates output serializer for canary to transform and send `visibility_filter` attribute with filter value
- updates output serializer for v3 to ignore any custom filter on visibility and return `paid` instead as v3 didn't have a concept of custom filter
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/849
Custom post visibility (behind alpha flag) is added to the API using new `visibility_filter` attribute that stores the custom filter. This change -
- updates validator for visibility to check new `visibility_filter` property
- cleans usage of i18n in favor of tpl
- This is part of the quest to separate the frontend and server & get rid of all the places where there are cross-requires
- At the moment the settings cache is one big shared cache used by the frontend and server liberally
- This change doesn't really solve the fundamental problems, as we still depend on events, and requires from inside frontend
- However it allows us to control the misuse slightly better by getting rid of restricted requires and turning on that eslint ruleset
- The main goal here is getting this settings related code out of the routing service as it really doesn't belong there
- This settings file is used purely by the API to get and set files - its not really anything to do with actual routing
- This file calls out to the bridge to do a reload, which helps decouple slightly
- More refactoring is needed to get rid of the urlService dependency
- Note this file is really similar to the redirects one, it would be good to merge them
- At the moment the bootstrap.start method asks the settings service for its settings
- This couples the routing and settings services together - when maybe we want to use a different method to generate settings
- By passing the settings to the routing service at the right time, we open up possibilities for refactoring
