no issue
Since we removed subscribers code in v3, we cannot use `models.Subscribers` for migration, and instead switch to using db directly for fetching existing subscribers before migrating them to members.
* Added from parameter for member emails
no issue
- Passed in the `from` parameter when initializing members mailer to be able to customize outgoing address
- Extends GhsotMailer to accept a from parameter from the outside
no issue
- Ghost 1.x stored markdown cards with the name `card-markdown`, this was changed in Ghost 2.x to be `markdown`. To keep compatibility with the older mobiledoc content the `markdown` card was aliased using a straightforward `Object.assign()`. Unfortunately this failed to work adequately when the url transformation functions were added to cards and resulted in corrupted data being returned in API responses
- moved the markdown card definition into a factory function so that a clean card definition object can be used for both the `markdown` and `card-markdown` cards
no issue
- `og_image` and `twitter_image` fields are now located in a separate model so the transform functionality for those fields needed to move accordingly
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/pull/11152
- Added subscribers table drop migration
- Removed subscribers from schema
- Removed subscribers controllers/routes/regression tests
- Removed subscriber related API code
- Removed subscribers from internal apps
- Removed subscriber importer
- Removed subscriber model
- Removed subscriber related permissions
- Removed webhook code related to subscribers
- When upgrading to v3 it is on the site admin to migrate all zapps or any other webhook clients to use members
- Removed subscriber-specific translation
- Removed subscriber lab flag
no issue
- Added test cases to check edit permission on settings endpoints
- Added test to demonstrate owner-only being able to toggle members flag
- Permission check when editing settings `lab.members`
- Passed additional function to permissions to allow custom selection of unsafe attributes due to settings object structure.
- Fully implementing this check on controller level would be wrong architecturally and not that straight forward because we lack role data in "frame"
- Cleaned up test after moving default_content_visibility to it's own property
* Added new `requirePaymentForSignup` setting for members
no issue
- Adds new `requirePaymentForSignup` setting flag for members, `false` by default.
- Wired members API `allowSelfSignup` to `requirePayment` setting
no issue
- Limited posts visibility field permissions to Editor-Up + Admin Integrations
- We don't want contributors or other roles lower than Editor to be able to modify content gating attribute
