0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-12-27 01:44:10 -05:00
forgejo/templates/repo/editor/upload.tmpl
wxiaoguang 5b89670a31
Use a general Eval function for expressions in templates. (#23927)
One of the proposals in #23328

This PR introduces a simple expression calculator
(templates/eval/eval.go), it can do basic expression calculations.

Many untested template helper functions like `Mul` `Add` can be replaced
by this new approach.

Then these `Add` / `Mul` / `percentage` / `Subtract` / `DiffStatsWidth`
could all use this `Eval`.

And it provides enhancements for Golang templates, and improves
readability.

Some examples:

----

* Before: `{{Add (Mul $glyph.Row 12) 12}}`
* After: `{{Eval $glyph.Row "*" 12 "+" 12}}`

----

* Before: `{{if lt (Add $i 1) (len $.Topics)}}`
* After: `{{if Eval $i "+" 1 "<" (len $.Topics)}}`

## FAQ

### Why not use an existing expression package?

We need a highly customized expression engine:

* do the calculation on the fly, without pre-compiling
* deal with int/int64/float64 types, to make the result could be used in
Golang template.
* make the syntax could be used in the Golang template directly
* do not introduce too much complex or strange syntax, we just need a
simple calculator.
* it needs to strictly follow Golang template's behavior, for example,
Golang template treats all non-zero values as truth, but many 3rd
packages don't do so.

### What's the benefit?

* Developers don't need to add more `Add`/`Mul`/`Sub`-like functions,
they were getting more and more.
Now, only one `Eval` is enough for all cases.
* The new code reads better than old `{{Add (Mul $glyph.Row 12) 12}}`,
the old one isn't familiar to most procedural programming developers
(eg, the Golang expression syntax).
* The `Eval` is fully covered by tests, many old `Add`/`Mul`-like
functions were never tested.

### The performance?

It doesn't use `reflect`, it doesn't need to parse or compile when used
in Golang template, the performance is as fast as native Go template.

### Is it too complex? Could it be unstable?

The expression calculator program is a common homework for computer
science students, and it's widely used as a teaching and practicing
purpose for developers. The algorithm is pretty well-known.

The behavior can be clearly defined, it is stable.
2023-04-07 21:25:49 +08:00

35 lines
1.5 KiB
Handlebars

{{template "base/head" .}}
<div role="main" aria-label="{{.Title}}" class="page-content repository file editor upload">
{{template "repo/header" .}}
<div class="ui container">
{{template "base/alert" .}}
<form class="ui comment form" method="post">
{{.CsrfTokenHtml}}
<div class="ui secondary menu">
<div class="item fitted treepath">
<div class="ui breadcrumb field {{if .Err_TreePath}}error{{end}}">
<a class="section" href="{{$.BranchLink}}">{{.Repository.Name}}</a>
{{$n := len .TreeNames}}
{{$l := Eval $n "-" 1}}
{{range $i, $v := .TreeNames}}
<div class="divider"> / </div>
{{if eq $i $l}}
<input type="text" id="file-name" value="{{$v}}" placeholder="{{$.locale.Tr "repo.editor.add_subdir"}}" autofocus>
<span data-tooltip-content="{{$.locale.Tr "repo.editor.filename_help"}}">{{svg "octicon-info"}}</span>
{{else}}
<span class="section"><a href="{{$.BranchLink}}/{{index $.TreePaths $i | PathEscapeSegments}}">{{$v}}</a></span>
{{end}}
{{end}}
<span>{{.locale.Tr "repo.editor.or"}} <a href="{{$.BranchLink}}{{if not .IsNewFile}}/{{.TreePath | PathEscapeSegments}}{{end}}">{{.locale.Tr "repo.editor.cancel_lower"}}</a></span>
<input type="hidden" id="tree_path" name="tree_path" value="{{.TreePath}}" required>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="field">
{{template "repo/upload" .}}
</div>
{{template "repo/editor/commit_form" .}}
</form>
</div>
</div>
{{template "base/footer" .}}