mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2024-12-24 08:06:49 -05:00
1bf9e44bda
In #9888, it was reported that my earlier pull request #9075 didn't quite function as expected. I was quite hopeful the `ValuesWithShadow()` worked as expected (and, I thought my testing showed it did) but I guess not. @zeripath proposed an alternative syntax which I like: ```ini [markup.sanitizer.1] ELEMENT=a ALLOW_ATTR=target REGEXP=something [markup.sanitizer.2] ELEMENT=a ALLOW_ATTR=target REGEXP=something ``` This was quite easy to adopt into the existing code. I've done so in a semi-backwards-compatible manner: - The value from `.Value()` is used for each element. - We parse `[markup.sanitizer]` and all `[markup.sanitizer.*]` sections and add them as rules. This means that existing configs will load one rule (not all rules). It also means people can use string identifiers (`[markup.sanitiser.KaTeX]`) if they prefer, instead of numbered ones. Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
analyze | ||
auth | ||
avatar | ||
base | ||
cache | ||
charset | ||
context | ||
convert | ||
cron | ||
emoji | ||
generate | ||
git | ||
gitgraph | ||
graceful | ||
highlight | ||
httplib | ||
indexer | ||
lfs | ||
log | ||
markup | ||
metrics | ||
migrations | ||
notification | ||
options | ||
password | ||
pprof | ||
private | ||
process | ||
public | ||
queue | ||
recaptcha | ||
references | ||
repofiles | ||
repository | ||
secret | ||
session | ||
setting | ||
ssh | ||
structs | ||
sync | ||
task | ||
templates | ||
test | ||
timeutil | ||
upload | ||
user | ||
util | ||
validation | ||
webhook |