mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2025-02-23 14:26:15 -05:00
03fe21d020
[skip ci] no related tests (covered by visual testing only) Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6459. More specifically, to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6459#issuecomment-2562521. Thanks, @viceice! I found a good reason to use `display: flex;` for the switch items: it prevents whitespaces between HTML tags from showing up between the icon and the text. I was wondering why the new switch is wider, now I noticed why while playing with it. Lack of this additional whitespace looks better and is consistent with most of the UI. ## Preview |Description|Image| |-|-| |The margin that's supposed to be (no whitespace)|| |Redesigned switch before|| |After|| Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6544 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
24 lines
523 B
CSS
24 lines
523 B
CSS
.switch {
|
|
display: grid;
|
|
grid-auto-flow: column;
|
|
height: fit-content;
|
|
align-items: center;
|
|
align-self: center;
|
|
background: var(--color-menu);
|
|
border: 1px solid var(--color-input-border);
|
|
border-radius: var(--border-radius);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.switch .item {
|
|
display: flex;
|
|
align-items: center;
|
|
padding: .5em 1.125em;
|
|
color: var(--color-text);
|
|
border-radius: var(--border-radius);
|
|
text-wrap: nowrap;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.switch .active.item {
|
|
background: var(--color-active);
|
|
outline: 1px solid var(--color-input-border);
|
|
}
|