https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6351#issuecomment-2585484 was fixed
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Other changes without a feature or bug label
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6656): <!--number 6656 --><!--line 0 --><!--description UmVsZWFzZS1ub3RlIGZvciBQUiAjNjM1MSB3YXMgYWRkZWQuIGh0dHBzOi8vY29kZWJlcmcub3JnL2Zvcmdlam8vZm9yZ2Vqby9wdWxscy82MzUxI2lzc3VlY29tbWVudC0yNTg1NDg0IHdhcyBmaXhlZA==-->Release-note for PR #6351 was added. https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6351#issuecomment-2585484 was fixed<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: gamzinav <gamzinav@basealt.ru>
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Gamzin <gamzin@altlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6656
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Alex619829 <alex619829@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Alex619829 <alex619829@noreply.codeberg.org>
If a row in the two_factor table references a non existent user, it may contain a secret that has an invalid format. Such an orphaned row is never used and should be removed.
Improve the error message to suggest using the doctor to remove it.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6637
## Testing
- make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' watch
- make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' forgejo
- sqlite3 data/gitea.db 'INSERT INTO two_factor VALUES( 0, 500, "", "", "", "", 0, 0)'
- ./forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency
```
[1] Check consistency of database
- [W] Found 1 Orphaned TwoFactor without existing User
OK
All done (checks: 1).
```
- ./forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency --fix
```
[1] Check consistency of database
- [I] Deleted 1 Orphaned TwoFactor without existing User
OK
All done (checks: 1).
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6639): <!--number 6639 --><!--line 0 --><!--description VGVhY2ggdGhlIGRvY3RvciB0byByZW1vdmUgb3JwaGFuZWQgdHdvX2ZhY3RvciB3aXRoIGBmb3JnZWpvIGRvY3RvciBjaGVjayAtLXJ1biBjaGVjay1kYi1jb25zaXN0ZW5jeSAtLWZpeGAuIFN1Y2ggcm93cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBpbnZhbGlkIGRhdGEgYW5kIFtibG9jayB0aGUgbWlncmF0aW9uIHRvIHYxMF0oaHR0cHM6Ly9jb2RlYmVyZy5vcmcvZm9yZ2Vqby9mb3JnZWpvL2lzc3Vlcy82NjM3KSB3aXRoIGEgbWVzc2FnZSBzdWNoIGFzIGBmYWlsZWQ6IEFlc0RlY3J5cHQgaW52YWxpZCBkZWNyeXB0ZWQgYmFzZTY0IHN0cmluZzogaWxsZWdhbCBiYXNlNjQgZGF0YSBhdCBpbnB1dCBieXRlIDBgLg==-->Teach the doctor to remove orphaned two_factor with `forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency --fix`. Such rows may contain invalid data and [block the migration to v10](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6637) with a message such as `failed: AesDecrypt invalid decrypted base64 string: illegal base64 data at input byte 0`.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6639
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
- Add a permission check that the doer has write permissions to the head
repository if the the 'delete branch after merge' is enabled when
merging a pull request.
- Unify the checks in the web and API router to `DeleteBranchAfterMerge`.
- Added integration tests.
- If you select a portion of the comment, `Quote reply` will not only
quote that portion and not copy paste the whole text as it previously
did. This is achieved by using the `@github/quote-selection` package.
- There's preprocessing to ensure Forgejo-flavored markdown syntax is
preserved.
- e2e test added.
- Resolves#1342
The Issue and PullRequest list has 3 states:
- open: This lists all open Issues/PullRequests
- closed: This lists all closed Issues/PullRequests
- all: This lists all open and closed Issues/PullRequests
If you want to get to the all state, you need to click Open while in open state or Closed while in closed state, which is very unintuitive. This PR adss a third button to get to this state.
I'm not sure if the eye icon fits well, but I couldn't find a better one.
Tests will be added once #4124 is merged.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4125
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Co-committed-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
- The Conan and Container packages use a different type of
authentication. It first authenticates via the regular way (api tokens
or user:password, handled via `auth.Basic`) and then generates a JWT
token that is used by the package software (such as Docker) to do the
action they wanted to do. This JWT token didn't properly propagate the
API scopes that the token was generated for, and thus could lead to a
'scope escalation' within the Conan and Container packages, read
access to write access.
- Store the API scope in the JWT token, so it can be propagated on
subsequent calls that uses that JWT token.
- Integration test added.
- Resolves#5128
- Moves to a fork of gitea.com/go-chi/session that removed support for
couchbase (and ledis, but that was never made available in Forgejo)
along with other code improvements.
f8ce677595..main
- The rationale for removing Couchbase is quite simple. Its not licensed
under FOSS
license (https://www.couchbase.com/blog/couchbase-adopts-bsl-license/)
and therefore cannot be tested by Forgejo and shouldn't be supported.
This is a similair vein to the removal of MSSQL
support (https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/122)
- A additional benefit is that this reduces the Forgejo binary by ~600Kb.
- Continuation of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18835 (by
@Gusted, so it's fine to change copyright holder to Forgejo).
- Add the option to use SSH for push mirrors, this would allow for the
deploy keys feature to be used and not require tokens to be used which
cannot be limited to a specific repository. The private key is stored
encrypted (via the `keying` module) on the database and NEVER given to
the user, to avoid accidental exposure and misuse.
- CAVEAT: This does require the `ssh` binary to be present, which may
not be available in containerized environments, this could be solved by
adding a SSH client into forgejo itself and use the forgejo binary as
SSH command, but should be done in another PR.
- CAVEAT: Mirroring of LFS content is not supported, this would require
the previous stated problem to be solved due to LFS authentication (an
attempt was made at forgejo/forgejo#2544).
- Integration test added.
- Resolves#4416
- When a comment was updated or deleted and was part of an
pending/ongoing review, it would have triggered a notification, such as
a webhook.
- This patch checks if the comment is part of a pending review and then
does not fire a notification and, in the case of updating a comment,
does not save the content history because this is not necessary if it is
still a "draft" comment given it is a pending comment (there is no need
to see my embarrassing typos).
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4368
