0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-12-29 02:44:08 -05:00
forgejo/services/repository/push.go

434 lines
14 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2020 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package repository
import (
"context"
"errors"
"fmt"
"strings"
"time"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
git_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/git"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/cache"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/gitrepo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/graceful"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/process"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/queue"
repo_module "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/repository"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
issue_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/issue"
notify_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/notify"
pull_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/pull"
)
// pushQueue represents a queue to handle update pull request tests
Rewrite queue (#24505) # ⚠️ Breaking Many deprecated queue config options are removed (actually, they should have been removed in 1.18/1.19). If you see the fatal message when starting Gitea: "Please update your app.ini to remove deprecated config options", please follow the error messages to remove these options from your app.ini. Example: ``` 2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].ISSUE_INDEXER_QUEUE_TYPE`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]` 2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].UPDATE_BUFFER_LEN`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]` 2023/05/06 19:39:22 [F] Please update your app.ini to remove deprecated config options ``` Many options in `[queue]` are are dropped, including: `WRAP_IF_NECESSARY`, `MAX_ATTEMPTS`, `TIMEOUT`, `WORKERS`, `BLOCK_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_WORKERS`, they can be removed from app.ini. # The problem The old queue package has some legacy problems: * complexity: I doubt few people could tell how it works. * maintainability: Too many channels and mutex/cond are mixed together, too many different structs/interfaces depends each other. * stability: due to the complexity & maintainability, sometimes there are strange bugs and difficult to debug, and some code doesn't have test (indeed some code is difficult to test because a lot of things are mixed together). * general applicability: although it is called "queue", its behavior is not a well-known queue. * scalability: it doesn't seem easy to make it work with a cluster without breaking its behaviors. It came from some very old code to "avoid breaking", however, its technical debt is too heavy now. It's a good time to introduce a better "queue" package. # The new queue package It keeps using old config and concept as much as possible. * It only contains two major kinds of concepts: * The "base queue": channel, levelqueue, redis * They have the same abstraction, the same interface, and they are tested by the same testing code. * The "WokerPoolQueue", it uses the "base queue" to provide "worker pool" function, calls the "handler" to process the data in the base queue. * The new code doesn't do "PushBack" * Think about a queue with many workers, the "PushBack" can't guarantee the order for re-queued unhandled items, so in new code it just does "normal push" * The new code doesn't do "pause/resume" * The "pause/resume" was designed to handle some handler's failure: eg: document indexer (elasticsearch) is down * If a queue is paused for long time, either the producers blocks or the new items are dropped. * The new code doesn't do such "pause/resume" trick, it's not a common queue's behavior and it doesn't help much. * If there are unhandled items, the "push" function just blocks for a few seconds and then re-queue them and retry. * The new code doesn't do "worker booster" * Gitea's queue's handlers are light functions, the cost is only the go-routine, so it doesn't make sense to "boost" them. * The new code only use "max worker number" to limit the concurrent workers. * The new "Push" never blocks forever * Instead of creating more and more blocking goroutines, return an error is more friendly to the server and to the end user. There are more details in code comments: eg: the "Flush" problem, the strange "code.index" hanging problem, the "immediate" queue problem. Almost ready for review. TODO: * [x] add some necessary comments during review * [x] add some more tests if necessary * [x] update documents and config options * [x] test max worker / active worker * [x] re-run the CI tasks to see whether any test is flaky * [x] improve the `handleOldLengthConfiguration` to provide more friendly messages * [x] fine tune default config values (eg: length?) ## Code coverage: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/236620635-55576955-f95d-4810-b12f-879026a3afdf.png)
2023-05-08 06:49:59 -05:00
var pushQueue *queue.WorkerPoolQueue[[]*repo_module.PushUpdateOptions]
// handle passed PR IDs and test the PRs
Rewrite queue (#24505) # ⚠️ Breaking Many deprecated queue config options are removed (actually, they should have been removed in 1.18/1.19). If you see the fatal message when starting Gitea: "Please update your app.ini to remove deprecated config options", please follow the error messages to remove these options from your app.ini. Example: ``` 2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].ISSUE_INDEXER_QUEUE_TYPE`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]` 2023/05/06 19:39:22 [E] Removed queue option: `[indexer].UPDATE_BUFFER_LEN`. Use new options in `[queue.issue_indexer]` 2023/05/06 19:39:22 [F] Please update your app.ini to remove deprecated config options ``` Many options in `[queue]` are are dropped, including: `WRAP_IF_NECESSARY`, `MAX_ATTEMPTS`, `TIMEOUT`, `WORKERS`, `BLOCK_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_TIMEOUT`, `BOOST_WORKERS`, they can be removed from app.ini. # The problem The old queue package has some legacy problems: * complexity: I doubt few people could tell how it works. * maintainability: Too many channels and mutex/cond are mixed together, too many different structs/interfaces depends each other. * stability: due to the complexity & maintainability, sometimes there are strange bugs and difficult to debug, and some code doesn't have test (indeed some code is difficult to test because a lot of things are mixed together). * general applicability: although it is called "queue", its behavior is not a well-known queue. * scalability: it doesn't seem easy to make it work with a cluster without breaking its behaviors. It came from some very old code to "avoid breaking", however, its technical debt is too heavy now. It's a good time to introduce a better "queue" package. # The new queue package It keeps using old config and concept as much as possible. * It only contains two major kinds of concepts: * The "base queue": channel, levelqueue, redis * They have the same abstraction, the same interface, and they are tested by the same testing code. * The "WokerPoolQueue", it uses the "base queue" to provide "worker pool" function, calls the "handler" to process the data in the base queue. * The new code doesn't do "PushBack" * Think about a queue with many workers, the "PushBack" can't guarantee the order for re-queued unhandled items, so in new code it just does "normal push" * The new code doesn't do "pause/resume" * The "pause/resume" was designed to handle some handler's failure: eg: document indexer (elasticsearch) is down * If a queue is paused for long time, either the producers blocks or the new items are dropped. * The new code doesn't do such "pause/resume" trick, it's not a common queue's behavior and it doesn't help much. * If there are unhandled items, the "push" function just blocks for a few seconds and then re-queue them and retry. * The new code doesn't do "worker booster" * Gitea's queue's handlers are light functions, the cost is only the go-routine, so it doesn't make sense to "boost" them. * The new code only use "max worker number" to limit the concurrent workers. * The new "Push" never blocks forever * Instead of creating more and more blocking goroutines, return an error is more friendly to the server and to the end user. There are more details in code comments: eg: the "Flush" problem, the strange "code.index" hanging problem, the "immediate" queue problem. Almost ready for review. TODO: * [x] add some necessary comments during review * [x] add some more tests if necessary * [x] update documents and config options * [x] test max worker / active worker * [x] re-run the CI tasks to see whether any test is flaky * [x] improve the `handleOldLengthConfiguration` to provide more friendly messages * [x] fine tune default config values (eg: length?) ## Code coverage: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/236620635-55576955-f95d-4810-b12f-879026a3afdf.png)
2023-05-08 06:49:59 -05:00
func handler(items ...[]*repo_module.PushUpdateOptions) [][]*repo_module.PushUpdateOptions {
for _, opts := range items {
if err := pushUpdates(opts); err != nil {
// Username and repository stays the same between items in opts.
pushUpdate := opts[0]
log.Error("pushUpdate[%s/%s] failed: %v", pushUpdate.RepoUserName, pushUpdate.RepoName, err)
}
}
return nil
}
func initPushQueue() error {
pushQueue = queue.CreateSimpleQueue(graceful.GetManager().ShutdownContext(), "push_update", handler)
if pushQueue == nil {
return errors.New("unable to create push_update queue")
}
go graceful.GetManager().RunWithCancel(pushQueue)
return nil
}
// PushUpdate is an alias of PushUpdates for single push update options
func PushUpdate(opts *repo_module.PushUpdateOptions) error {
return PushUpdates([]*repo_module.PushUpdateOptions{opts})
}
// PushUpdates adds a push update to push queue
func PushUpdates(opts []*repo_module.PushUpdateOptions) error {
if len(opts) == 0 {
return nil
}
for _, opt := range opts {
if opt.IsNewRef() && opt.IsDelRef() {
return fmt.Errorf("Old and new revisions are both NULL")
}
}
return pushQueue.Push(opts)
}
// pushUpdates generates push action history feeds for push updating multiple refs
func pushUpdates(optsList []*repo_module.PushUpdateOptions) error {
if len(optsList) == 0 {
return nil
}
ctx, _, finished := process.GetManager().AddContext(graceful.GetManager().HammerContext(), fmt.Sprintf("PushUpdates: %s/%s", optsList[0].RepoUserName, optsList[0].RepoName))
defer finished()
repo, err := repo_model.GetRepositoryByOwnerAndName(ctx, optsList[0].RepoUserName, optsList[0].RepoName)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("GetRepositoryByOwnerAndName failed: %w", err)
}
gitRepo, err := gitrepo.OpenRepository(ctx, repo)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("OpenRepository[%s]: %w", repo.FullName(), err)
}
defer gitRepo.Close()
objectFormat, err := gitRepo.GetObjectFormat()
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("unknown repository ObjectFormat [%s]: %w", repo.FullName(), err)
}
if err = repo_module.UpdateRepoSize(ctx, repo); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to update size for repository: %v", err)
}
addTags := make([]string, 0, len(optsList))
delTags := make([]string, 0, len(optsList))
var pusher *user_model.User
for _, opts := range optsList {
log.Trace("pushUpdates: %-v %s %s %s", repo, opts.OldCommitID, opts.NewCommitID, opts.RefFullName)
if opts.IsNewRef() && opts.IsDelRef() {
return fmt.Errorf("old and new revisions are both %s", objectFormat.EmptyObjectID())
}
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-25 20:04:48 -05:00
if opts.RefFullName.IsTag() {
if pusher == nil || pusher.ID != opts.PusherID {
Implement actions (#21937) Close #13539. Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others. Related projects: - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go - https://gitea.com/gitea/act - https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ### Summary The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions", an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note that: - It is disabled by default; - It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently; - It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently; - Breaking changes may be made before it's stable. **Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**. ### ⚠️ Breaking `gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it. ### Some important reviews - What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954 - Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592 - Why DBFS? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178 - Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103 - Why there's no permission control for actions? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868 ### What it looks like <details> #### Manage runners <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png"> #### List runs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png"> #### View logs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png"> </details> ### How to try it <details> #### 1. Start Gitea Clone this branch and [install from source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source). Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions: ```ini [actions] ENABLED = true ``` Start it. If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png"> #### 2. Start runner Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow the [README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md) to start it. If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png"> #### 3. Enable actions for a repo Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox in settings and submit. <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png"> <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png"> If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions": <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png"> #### 4. Upload workflow files Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart) of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions in most cases, you can use the same demo: ```yaml name: GitHub Actions Demo run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀 on: [push] jobs: Explore-GitHub-Actions: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event." - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!" - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}." - name: Check out repository code uses: actions/checkout@v3 - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner." - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner." - name: List files in the repository run: | ls ${{ github.workspace }} - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}." ``` If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png"> #### 5. Check the logs of jobs Click a run and you'll see the logs: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png"> #### 6. Go on You can try more examples in [the documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions) of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs. Come on, PRs are welcome. </details> See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/) --------- Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-30 20:45:19 -05:00
if opts.PusherID == user_model.ActionsUserID {
pusher = user_model.NewActionsUser()
} else {
var err error
if pusher, err = user_model.GetUserByID(ctx, opts.PusherID); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-25 20:04:48 -05:00
tagName := opts.RefFullName.TagName()
if opts.IsDelRef() {
notify_service.PushCommits(
ctx, pusher, repo,
&repo_module.PushUpdateOptions{
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-25 20:04:48 -05:00
RefFullName: git.RefNameFromTag(tagName),
OldCommitID: opts.OldCommitID,
NewCommitID: objectFormat.EmptyObjectID().String(),
}, repo_module.NewPushCommits())
delTags = append(delTags, tagName)
notify_service.DeleteRef(ctx, pusher, repo, opts.RefFullName)
} else { // is new tag
newCommit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(opts.NewCommitID)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("gitRepo.GetCommit(%s) in %s/%s[%d]: %w", opts.NewCommitID, repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, repo.ID, err)
}
commits := repo_module.NewPushCommits()
commits.HeadCommit = repo_module.CommitToPushCommit(newCommit)
commits.CompareURL = repo.ComposeCompareURL(objectFormat.EmptyObjectID().String(), opts.NewCommitID)
notify_service.PushCommits(
ctx, pusher, repo,
&repo_module.PushUpdateOptions{
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-25 20:04:48 -05:00
RefFullName: opts.RefFullName,
OldCommitID: objectFormat.EmptyObjectID().String(),
NewCommitID: opts.NewCommitID,
}, commits)
addTags = append(addTags, tagName)
notify_service.CreateRef(ctx, pusher, repo, opts.RefFullName, opts.NewCommitID)
}
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-25 20:04:48 -05:00
} else if opts.RefFullName.IsBranch() {
if pusher == nil || pusher.ID != opts.PusherID {
Implement actions (#21937) Close #13539. Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others. Related projects: - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go - https://gitea.com/gitea/act - https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ### Summary The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions", an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note that: - It is disabled by default; - It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently; - It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently; - Breaking changes may be made before it's stable. **Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**. ### ⚠️ Breaking `gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it. ### Some important reviews - What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954 - Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592 - Why DBFS? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178 - Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103 - Why there's no permission control for actions? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868 ### What it looks like <details> #### Manage runners <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png"> #### List runs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png"> #### View logs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png"> </details> ### How to try it <details> #### 1. Start Gitea Clone this branch and [install from source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source). Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions: ```ini [actions] ENABLED = true ``` Start it. If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png"> #### 2. Start runner Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow the [README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md) to start it. If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png"> #### 3. Enable actions for a repo Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox in settings and submit. <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png"> <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png"> If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions": <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png"> #### 4. Upload workflow files Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart) of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions in most cases, you can use the same demo: ```yaml name: GitHub Actions Demo run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀 on: [push] jobs: Explore-GitHub-Actions: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event." - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!" - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}." - name: Check out repository code uses: actions/checkout@v3 - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner." - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner." - name: List files in the repository run: | ls ${{ github.workspace }} - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}." ``` If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png"> #### 5. Check the logs of jobs Click a run and you'll see the logs: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png"> #### 6. Go on You can try more examples in [the documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions) of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs. Come on, PRs are welcome. </details> See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/) --------- Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-30 20:45:19 -05:00
if opts.PusherID == user_model.ActionsUserID {
pusher = user_model.NewActionsUser()
} else {
var err error
if pusher, err = user_model.GetUserByID(ctx, opts.PusherID); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-25 20:04:48 -05:00
branch := opts.RefFullName.BranchName()
if !opts.IsDelRef() {
log.Trace("TriggerTask '%s/%s' by %s", repo.Name, branch, pusher.Name)
pull_service.AddTestPullRequestTask(ctx, pusher, repo.ID, branch, true, opts.OldCommitID, opts.NewCommitID)
newCommit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(opts.NewCommitID)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("gitRepo.GetCommit(%s) in %s/%s[%d]: %w", opts.NewCommitID, repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, repo.ID, err)
}
refName := opts.RefName()
// Push new branch.
var l []*git.Commit
if opts.IsNewRef() {
if repo.IsEmpty { // Change default branch and empty status only if pushed ref is non-empty branch.
repo.DefaultBranch = refName
repo.IsEmpty = false
if repo.DefaultBranch != setting.Repository.DefaultBranch {
if err := gitRepo.SetDefaultBranch(repo.DefaultBranch); err != nil {
if !git.IsErrUnsupportedVersion(err) {
return err
}
}
}
// Update the is empty and default_branch columns
if err := repo_model.UpdateRepositoryCols(ctx, repo, "default_branch", "is_empty"); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("UpdateRepositoryCols: %w", err)
}
}
l, err = newCommit.CommitsBeforeLimit(10)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("newCommit.CommitsBeforeLimit: %w", err)
}
notify_service.CreateRef(ctx, pusher, repo, opts.RefFullName, opts.NewCommitID)
} else {
l, err = newCommit.CommitsBeforeUntil(opts.OldCommitID)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("newCommit.CommitsBeforeUntil: %w", err)
}
isForcePush, err := newCommit.IsForcePush(opts.OldCommitID)
if err != nil {
log.Error("IsForcePush %s:%s failed: %v", repo.FullName(), branch, err)
}
if isForcePush {
log.Trace("Push %s is a force push", opts.NewCommitID)
cache.Remove(repo.GetCommitsCountCacheKey(opts.RefName(), true))
} else {
// TODO: increment update the commit count cache but not remove
cache.Remove(repo.GetCommitsCountCacheKey(opts.RefName(), true))
}
}
commits := repo_module.GitToPushCommits(l)
commits.HeadCommit = repo_module.CommitToPushCommit(newCommit)
if err := issue_service.UpdateIssuesCommit(ctx, pusher, repo, commits.Commits, refName); err != nil {
log.Error("updateIssuesCommit: %v", err)
}
oldCommitID := opts.OldCommitID
if oldCommitID == objectFormat.EmptyObjectID().String() && len(commits.Commits) > 0 {
oldCommit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(commits.Commits[len(commits.Commits)-1].Sha1)
if err != nil && !git.IsErrNotExist(err) {
log.Error("unable to GetCommit %s from %-v: %v", oldCommitID, repo, err)
}
if oldCommit != nil {
for i := 0; i < oldCommit.ParentCount(); i++ {
commitID, _ := oldCommit.ParentID(i)
if !commitID.IsZero() {
oldCommitID = commitID.String()
break
}
}
}
}
if oldCommitID == objectFormat.EmptyObjectID().String() && repo.DefaultBranch != branch {
oldCommitID = repo.DefaultBranch
}
if oldCommitID != objectFormat.EmptyObjectID().String() {
commits.CompareURL = repo.ComposeCompareURL(oldCommitID, opts.NewCommitID)
} else {
commits.CompareURL = ""
}
if len(commits.Commits) > setting.UI.FeedMaxCommitNum {
commits.Commits = commits.Commits[:setting.UI.FeedMaxCommitNum]
}
if err = syncBranchToDB(ctx, repo.ID, opts.PusherID, branch, newCommit); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("git_model.UpdateBranch %s:%s failed: %v", repo.FullName(), branch, err)
}
notify_service.PushCommits(ctx, pusher, repo, opts, commits)
// Cache for big repository
if err := CacheRef(graceful.GetManager().HammerContext(), repo, gitRepo, opts.RefFullName); err != nil {
log.Error("repo_module.CacheRef %s/%s failed: %v", repo.ID, branch, err)
}
} else {
notify_service.DeleteRef(ctx, pusher, repo, opts.RefFullName)
if err = pull_service.CloseBranchPulls(ctx, pusher, repo.ID, branch); err != nil {
// close all related pulls
log.Error("close related pull request failed: %v", err)
}
if err := git_model.AddDeletedBranch(ctx, repo.ID, branch, pusher.ID); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("AddDeletedBranch %s:%s failed: %v", repo.FullName(), branch, err)
}
}
// Even if user delete a branch on a repository which he didn't watch, he will be watch that.
if err = repo_model.WatchIfAuto(ctx, opts.PusherID, repo.ID, true); err != nil {
log.Warn("Fail to perform auto watch on user %v for repo %v: %v", opts.PusherID, repo.ID, err)
}
} else {
log.Trace("Non-tag and non-branch commits pushed.")
}
}
if err := PushUpdateAddDeleteTags(ctx, repo, gitRepo, addTags, delTags); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("PushUpdateAddDeleteTags: %w", err)
}
// Change repository last updated time.
if err := repo_model.UpdateRepositoryUpdatedTime(ctx, repo.ID, time.Now()); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("UpdateRepositoryUpdatedTime: %w", err)
}
return nil
}
// PushUpdateAddDeleteTags updates a number of added and delete tags
func PushUpdateAddDeleteTags(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, gitRepo *git.Repository, addTags, delTags []string) error {
return db.WithTx(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) error {
if err := repo_model.PushUpdateDeleteTagsContext(ctx, repo, delTags); err != nil {
return err
}
return pushUpdateAddTags(ctx, repo, gitRepo, addTags)
})
}
// pushUpdateAddTags updates a number of add tags
func pushUpdateAddTags(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, gitRepo *git.Repository, tags []string) error {
if len(tags) == 0 {
return nil
}
lowerTags := make([]string, 0, len(tags))
for _, tag := range tags {
lowerTags = append(lowerTags, strings.ToLower(tag))
}
releases, err := db.Find[repo_model.Release](ctx, repo_model.FindReleasesOptions{
RepoID: repo.ID,
TagNames: lowerTags,
})
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("db.Find[repo_model.Release]: %w", err)
}
relMap := make(map[string]*repo_model.Release)
for _, rel := range releases {
relMap[rel.LowerTagName] = rel
}
newReleases := make([]*repo_model.Release, 0, len(lowerTags)-len(relMap))
emailToUser := make(map[string]*user_model.User)
for i, lowerTag := range lowerTags {
tag, err := gitRepo.GetTag(tags[i])
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("GetTag: %w", err)
}
commit, err := tag.Commit(gitRepo)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Commit: %w", err)
}
sig := tag.Tagger
if sig == nil {
sig = commit.Author
}
if sig == nil {
sig = commit.Committer
}
var author *user_model.User
createdAt := time.Unix(1, 0)
if sig != nil {
var ok bool
author, ok = emailToUser[sig.Email]
if !ok {
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294) To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept `context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor `GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not be loaded twice on an HTTP request. But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed. The core context cache is here. It defines a new context ```go type cacheContext struct { ctx context.Context data map[any]map[any]any lock sync.RWMutex } var cacheContextKey = struct{}{} func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context { return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{ ctx: ctx, data: make(map[any]map[any]any), }) } ``` Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within the same context. ```go func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any) func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error) ``` Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it. ```go func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) { return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) { return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) { res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key) if err != nil { return "", err } return res.SettingValue, nil }) }) } ``` First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be set into the context cache. An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the context disappeared.
2023-02-15 08:37:34 -05:00
author, err = user_model.GetUserByEmail(ctx, sig.Email)
if err != nil && !user_model.IsErrUserNotExist(err) {
return fmt.Errorf("GetUserByEmail: %w", err)
}
if author != nil {
emailToUser[sig.Email] = author
}
}
createdAt = sig.When
}
commitsCount, err := commit.CommitsCount()
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("CommitsCount: %w", err)
}
rel, has := relMap[lowerTag]
if !has {
parts := strings.SplitN(tag.Message, "\n", 2)
note := ""
if len(parts) > 1 {
note = parts[1]
}
rel = &repo_model.Release{
RepoID: repo.ID,
Title: parts[0],
TagName: tags[i],
LowerTagName: lowerTag,
Target: "",
Sha1: commit.ID.String(),
NumCommits: commitsCount,
Note: note,
IsDraft: false,
IsPrerelease: false,
IsTag: true,
CreatedUnix: timeutil.TimeStamp(createdAt.Unix()),
}
if author != nil {
rel.PublisherID = author.ID
}
newReleases = append(newReleases, rel)
} else {
rel.Sha1 = commit.ID.String()
rel.CreatedUnix = timeutil.TimeStamp(createdAt.Unix())
rel.NumCommits = commitsCount
rel.IsDraft = false
if rel.IsTag && author != nil {
rel.PublisherID = author.ID
}
if err = repo_model.UpdateRelease(ctx, rel); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Update: %w", err)
}
}
}
if len(newReleases) > 0 {
if err = db.Insert(ctx, newReleases); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Insert: %w", err)
}
}
return nil
}