From 6611b6b93135a61eda57a3c04a1c08df5de07be6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexey Pyltsyn Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:11:12 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Update Docusaurus performance score (#1447) --- docs/src/pages/comparing-astro-vs-other-tools.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/src/pages/comparing-astro-vs-other-tools.md b/docs/src/pages/comparing-astro-vs-other-tools.md index 3bdf3b2af0..a4be9e023c 100644 --- a/docs/src/pages/comparing-astro-vs-other-tools.md +++ b/docs/src/pages/comparing-astro-vs-other-tools.md @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Docusaurus doesn't support partial hydration, and instead makes the user load an [docusaurus.io/docs](https://docusaurus.io/docs) is the official Docusaurus documentation website, built with Docusaurus. The website offers a similar enough design and featureset to compare against the official Astro documentation website. This gives us a **_rough, real-world_** comparison between the two site builders. -- **Docusaurus performance score**: 26 out of 100 [(full audit)](https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocusaurus.io%2Fdocs) +- **Docusaurus performance score**: 61 out of 100 [(full audit)](https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocusaurus.io%2Fdocs) - **Astro performance score**: 99 out of 100 [(full audit)](https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.astro.build%2Fgetting-started) One big reason behind this performance difference is Astro's smaller JavaScript payload: [docusaurus.io/docs](https://docusaurus.io/docs) loads **238kb** of JavaScript on first page load while [docs.astro.build](https://docs.astro.build) loads **78.7kb** (67% less JavaScript, overall) _after_ first load.